| 106 | 2 | 22 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 通过比较Waardenburg综合征（waardenburg syndrome,WS）患者与非Waardenburg综合征患者人工耳蜗植入术后听力言语恢复效果，明确人工耳蜗植入术能否成为WS患者治疗的有效方式,从而指导临床工作。方法在PubMed、The Cochrane Library、中国知网、维普医学、万方数据检索国内外关于WS人工耳蜗植入的文献，使用Revman5.41对符合纳入标准的文献临床数据进行Meta分析。结果 本研究纳入的文献中，其中包括108例WS患者及785例对照组，Meta分析显示WS组与对照组在术后听觉行为分级标准（Categories of Auditory Performance, CAP）(WS组48例,对照组620例)(MD=-0.10,95%CI:-0.38～0.17,P=0.46)、言语可懂度分级标准（speech intelligibility rating,SIR)评分(WS组48例,对照组620例)(MD=-0.23,95%CI:-0.68～0.22,P=0.31)及青少年儿童及婴幼儿听说能力评估问卷家长观察记录表(parents'evaluation of aural/oral performance of children,PEACH)[电话评分(WS组37例,对照组53例)(MD=0.13,95%CI:-0.48～0.74,P=0.68)、安静评分(WS组37例,对照组53例)(MD=-0.01,95%CI:-0.10～0.09,P=0.91)、噪音评分(WS组37例，对照组53例)(MD=-0.01,95%CI:-0.11～0.10,P=0.88)]比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 WS患者人工耳蜗植入术后听力言语恢复与非WS综合征患者基本一致。
Abstract：Objective To evaluate the value of cochlear implantation as a treatment for WS by comparing hearing and speech recovery after cochlear implantation between Waardenburg syndrome(WS) and non Waardenburg syndrome patients. Methods The literatures on WS cochlear implantation published in China and abroad were retrieved from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP medicine and Wanfang databases, and clinical data of studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed using the Revman5.41 software. Results A total of 8 articles were included in this study, including 108 patients with WS and 785 control groups. Meta analysis showed that the scores of categories of audit performance(CAP) in the WS group and the control group(48 cases in the WS group and 620 Cases in the control group)(MD=-0.10, 95%CI-0.38 ～ 0.17, P=0.46)Speech intelligibility rating(SIR) score(48 cases in WS group and 620 Cases in control group)(MD=-0.23, 95%CI-0.68 ～ 0.22, P=0.31),, parents' evaluation of aural/oral performance of children,peach [telephone score(37 cases in WS group and 53 cases in control group)(MD=0.13,95%CI-0.48 ～ 0.74, P=0.68),quiet score(37 cases in WS group and 53 cases in control group control group(53 cases)(MD=-0.01, 95%CI-0.10 ～0.09, P=0.91), noise score(37 cases in WS group and 53 cases in control group)(MD=-0.01,95%CI-0.11 ～ 0.10, P=0.88)] there was no significant difference. Conclusion The hearing and speech recovery of WS patients after cochlear implantation was basically the same as that of non WS patients.
1李进,关静,张静,等.PAX3基因突变相关Waardenburg综合征家系及散发患者基因型与表型特征分析[J].中华耳科学杂志,2020,18(2):232-236.Li J, Guan J, Zhang J, et al. Genotypical and phenotypical characteristics of PAX3 mutations associated Waardenburg syndrome in families and sporadic patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology,2020,18(2):232-236.
2 李霞,赵声波,毕先云,等.PAX3基因新突变致Ⅰ型Waardenburg综合征家系基因型与表型特征分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2021,35(7):621-626.Li X, Zhao SB,Bi XY, et al. Genotype and phenotype analysis of a family with Waardenburg syndrome typeⅠcaused by a novel mutation in PAX 3 gene[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,2021,35(7):621-626.
3 Amirsalari S, Ajallouyean M, Saburi A, et al. Cochlear implantation outcomes in children with Waardenburg syndrome[J]. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2012, 269(10):2179-2183.
4 de Sousa Andrade S M, Monteiro A R T, Martins J H F, et al. Cochlear implant rehabilitation outcomes in Waardenburg syndrome children[J]. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology,2012,76(9):1375-1378.
5 El Bakkouri W, Loundon N, Thierry B, et al. Cochlear implantation and congenital deafness:perceptive and lexical results in 2genetically pediatric identified population[J]. Otol Neurotol.2012,33(4):539-544.
6 褚玉会,张智风,陈春丽,等. Waardenburg syndrome聋儿人工耳蜗植入术疗效观察[J].河南外科学杂志,2017,23(4):5-6.Chu YH, Zhang ZF, Chen CL, et al. Therapeutic effect of cochlear implantation in children with Waardenburg syndrome[J].Henan Journal of Surgery,2017,23(4):5-6.
7 董思淇,李佳楠,焦青山,等. Waardenburg综合征患者人工耳蜗植入术后听觉言语康复效果分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2013,(5):350-353.Dong SQ, Li JN, Jiao QS, et al. The effectiveness analysis of the cochlear implantation in patients with Waardenburg syndrome[J]. Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2013(5):350-353.
8 高芳芳,王启荣,于淑东,等.人工耳蜗植入术295例语言康复临床分析[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2018,32(2):62-65.Gao FF, Wang QR, Yu SD, et al. Clinical analysis of language rehabilitation in 295 cases of cochlear implantation[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University,2018,32(2):62-65.
9 van Nierop J W I, Snabel R R, Langereis M, et al. Paediatric cochlear implantation in patients with Waardenburg syndrome[J].Audiology and Neurotology,2016,21(3):187-194.
10 张志利,曹克利,魏朝刚,等. Waardenburg综合征患者人工耳蜗植入后效果分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2009,17(4):372-375.Zhang ZL, Cao KL, Wei CG, et al. The outcomes measures of the cochlear implantation in patients with Waardenburg syndrome[J]. Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology,2009,17(4):372-375.
11 吴俪媛,陈梦冰,李梦华,等.EDNRB基因在Waardenburg综合征发病中的作用研究进展[J].中华耳科学杂志,2022,20(2):344-348.Wu LY, Chen MB, Li MH, et al. Recent research on the role of the EDNRB gene in Waardenburg syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology,2022,20(2):344-348.
12 G W, X L, X G, et al. Analysis of genotype-phenotype relationships in 90 Chinese probands with Waardenburg syndrome[J].Human genetics,2022,141:839-852.
13 胡健,赵晓云,徐百成.常见聋病相关基因突变与人工耳蜗植入术后效果的相关性研究进展[J].中华耳科学杂志,2020,18(02):371-376.Hu J, Zhao XY, Xu BC. Progress of research on correlation between deafness-related gene mutation and auditory and speech rehabilitation after cochlear implantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology,2020,18(02):371-376.
14 刘薇,于永波,陈敏,等.SOX10点突变致Waardenburg综合征2型一家系分析[J].中华耳科学杂志,2020,18(05):829-832.Liu W, Yu YB, Chen M, et al. SOX10 gene mutation in a family with Waardenburg syndrome type 2[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology,2020,18(05):829-832.
15 赵娜,王晶,肖涵,等.中国人群Waardenburg综合征的临床及基因变异特点分析[J].中华医学遗传学杂志,2020,37(10):1186-1190.Zhao N, Wang J, Xiao H, et al. Clinical and genetic characteristics of Chinese patients with Waardenburg syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics,2020,37(10):1186-1190.
16 倪晓琛,李佳楠,郭维维,等. MITF新突变致Waardenburg综合征以及相关致病机制探讨[J].中华耳科学杂志,2022,20(03):371-376.Ni XC, Li JN, Guo WW, et al. A novel MITF mutation and related pathogenesis in Waardenburg syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology,2022,20(03):371-376.
17 陈善文,姚昆,邱建新.部分综合征型耳聋行人工耳蜗治疗的研究进展[J].中华耳科学杂志,2022,20(02):324-328.Chen SW, Yao K, Qiu JX. Efficacy of cochlear implantation in syndromic deafness[J]. Chinese Journal of Otology,2022,20(02):324-328.
18 Albalawi Y, Nidami M, Almohawas F, et al. Categories of auditory performance and speech intelligibility ratings in prelingually deaf children with bilateral implantation[J]. Am J Audiol. 2019Mar 15;28(1):62-68.
19 孙茂钢,刘凯,孙瑜宁,等.脑白质异常聋儿人工耳蜗植入术后听觉言语康复效果meta分析[J].中华耳科学杂志,2021,19(04):616-621.Sun MG, Liu K, Sun YN, et al. A meta-analysis of hearing and speech rehabilitation outcomes after cochlear implantation in deaf children with white matter abnormalities[J].Chinese Journal of Otology,2021,19(04):616-621.
20 Zhang VW, Xu T, Ching TYC, et al. The Chinese version of the Parents'Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children(PEACH)rating scale for infants and children with normal hearing. Int J Audiol[J]. 2021 Jul,16:1-7.
基本信息:
中图分类号:R764.9
引用信息:
[1]秦锋,郭思荃,马敬,等.Waardenburg综合征患者人工耳蜗植入术后疗效Meta分析[J].中华耳科学杂志,2023,21(06):785-790.
2023-12-29
2023-12-29